甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震前后区域地壳形变分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

地震科技星火计划(XH15061Y);地震行业科研专项(201308009);震情跟踪青年课题(2015010205)


Regional Crustal Deformation Analysis before and after the Minxian-Zhangxian Earthquake
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    利用陆态网GNSS连续站及流动站观测数据处理结果,从坐标时间序列、基线时间序列、速度场、形变场等方面分析岷县漳县地震前后青藏高原东北缘地区GPS形变场变化,得出以下结论:岷县漳县地震前GNSS测站时间序列没有明显变化,震前异常不突出;地震引起不同测点不同程度的永久性同震位移,最大值达到16 mm;地震前后基线变化不明显,未发现明显的前兆异常;阿拉善及附近的祁连构造带存在顺时针运动的迹象,即运动方向由东侧的南西向逐渐变到西部的北西向,运动大小的范围基本保持在7 mm/a之内;区域主压应变优势方向为东北-西南向,最大主压应变区呈带状分布于研究区域南部。

    Abstract:

    With the establishment of the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) and the China Tectonic Environment Monitoring Network (CMTEMN),earthquake coseismic displacement can be obtained through global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data processing and analysis.The calculated results can provide basic research data for further study on seismic dynamics characteristics and determination of future earthquake trends.Using the GNSS data processing results from CMTEMN and CMONOC,together with the coordinate time series from the continuous observation stations,the baseline time series between two stations and the velocity and deformation fields were investigated in this study.In addition,the global positioning system deformation field of the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau before and after the Minxian-Zhangxian Earthquake was analyzed.The results showed that the coordinate time series of the GNSS stations showed no noticeable change before the Minxian-Zhangxian Earthquake,and there were no prominent anomalies before the earthquake.The earthquake caused different levels of permanent co-seismic displacement of various stations,the maximum of which was as much as 16 mm This GSMX station,which is near the epicenter in the Lintan-Dangchang fault,exhibited a noticeable coseismic displacement.The GSWD station had no coseismic displacement.Similarly, the GSLX station,which was far from the epicenter,also experienced no displacement.The strain change of the three stations proved that the east-west strain was primarily linear,and there was no noticeable imminent anomaly before the earthquake removal of the coseismic step.The north-south strain exhibited a cycle and a half phenomenon,which was related to a corresponding year cycle in a single point,so this was not an obvious imminent anomaly prior to the earthquake.In addition to the obvious linear change,the north-east shear strain showed specific cycles,but no obvious anomalies before the quake,and these were restored to their original displacement after the quake.The GNSS baseline length change was based on the unity of the reference frame,so it was unaffected by the reference benchmark,therefore,it would objectively reflect the dynamic changes of the relative motion between two stations.Therefore,the GNSS baseline time series analysis was used to extract the crust movement microdynamic information as one of the direct routes.In this study,three stations close to the epicenter formed a triangular mesh,crossing the epicenter and the Lintan-Dangchang fault zone.Using the GSWD station as a reference, the statistical baseline series of the GSMX and GSLX stations were analyzed,and the results showed that there was no significant change of the baseline before and after the earthquake and no obvious anomalies;In addition,the long baseline time series across the Lintan-Dangchang fault was calculated employing six stations on either side of the seismogenic tectonic,forming five baselines.The results were same with the short baseline,before the earthquake,the baseline did not exhibit an obvious precursory change phenomenon,and the baseline change caused by the earthquake was not obvious in totality.There were signs of a clockwise motion near the Alashan and Qilian structural belt,where the direction of movement was south west on the east side and north west on the west side.The magnitude of the movement was within 7,which may explain why the push movement to the north in the western region was greater in the eastern area.In addition,due to the extrusion of the Ordos block in the east of the research area,the direction of movement of the edge of the block at the southeastern end in this region was to the southwest and its velocity was approximately 5 mm/a,The movement of the block was diminished in the western portion.The primary direction of the principal compressive strain from 2011 to 2013 was from the SE to NW,the region of maximum strain exhibited zonal distribution and was located in the southern part of the research area.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱爽,周伟.甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震前后区域地壳形变分析[J].地震工程学报,2015,37(3):731-738. ZHU Shuang, ZHOU Wei. Regional Crustal Deformation Analysis before and after the Minxian-Zhangxian Earthquake[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2015,37(3):731-738.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-12-25